Author: tlaforme

The Town of South Bruce Peninsula is giving up its legal battle over Piping Plover habitat at Sauble Beach after losing another appeal in the matter recently.

• Council To Discuss Next Move After Lost Appeal In Sauble Plover Court Battle
• Town Loses Appeal Over Plover Habitat At Sauble Beach

The town was convicted in 2019 of damaging habitat of the endangered shore bird, by raking and grading the beach in prior years.

South Bruce Peninsula council met in closed session April 28 to discuss next steps after three judges dismissed an appeal by the town which argued the courts erred in their interpretation of the word ‘damage’, and that the opinion of a Ministry of Natural Resources Biologist should not have been accepted as the Ministry was the regulatory agency that charged the town.

After the closed session meeting, South Bruce Peninsula council released the following statement on the town’s website:

Council has accepted the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal and will not further pursue this matter.

After an exhaustive and expensive effort, it is evident to us that fighting large, well-funded environmental groups coupled with ambiguous legislation is futile. There seems to be no appetite to oppose these groups, regardless of the circumstances. It is unfortunate that the Town has had to fight to maintain our beach when other communities with Plovers maintain theirs annually in much the same way, without being challenged or charged. Council has always acted in the best interest of our town, in fact through our collaborative stewardship, we saw the largest Plover population in our history return to Sauble after we reclaimed the beach.

The bottom line from this trial is that even though the Plaintiff’s expert witnesses could not prove that we damaged Plover habitat, we were convicted anyway.

For 5 years now, the town has been prevented from touching the beach other than to clear the drainage swales and remove dangerous items, yet we are expected to responsibly host a million tourists each year. Winning this case was critical because a loss will very likely prevent us from properly maintaining our beach again.

Sauble Beach brings millions in tourism and millions in property taxation. This revenue to our taxpayers and businesses is generated primarily because of the beach. People visit and live at the beach because of the beach. Yes, this case has come with a hefty price tag, but we make nearly a million per year in parking revenue alone. Tourists pay our taxpayers a million dollars per year just to visit Sauble Beach.

This case has been ongoing for 5 years and the cost to defend our beach when averaged over that 5-year period, fell within our budget resulting in no property tax increases. We simply had to fight for the right to maintain our own asset, an asset that is critical to our Town.

This Council and the previous Council were committed to ridding our beach of the invasive Willow bushes that blanketed the north end. We suffered a near complete loss of our northern beach as most will remember. The job we did to rid the beach of Willows has endured these last five years. Between bulldozing them out and then killing the remaining Willows with herbicides, we were able to eradicate them. To our good fortune, the high-water levels the following year washed away the remaining dead bushes. We now have our beach back and it’s looking fairly good. Returning our beach to the people has been worth the fight however we worry about how long this will last. The Willows won’t remain at bay forever. This Council will continue to do our best to preserve our beach and ensure its beauty and active enjoyment for our residents and visitors for years to come. In fact, this Council would not hesitate to fight for any area of our Town that is under the threat of loss. We hope that in the future, the Province doesn’t deem any of our other parks a habitat to a discovered species and removes it from public access.

Council stands by its decision to fight for our beach however it is clear that we cannot beat the large environmental groups and the pressure they put on the Province to charge our Town.

This case has now drawn to a close, but this Council will never stop defending the rights of our Town.

Janice Jackson – Mayor

Town of South Bruce Peninsula

Full Story Here

The third time was not the charm for the Town of South Bruce Peninsula, Ont.

The municipality had its appeal of destroying endangered piping plover habitat dismissed by Ontario’s Court of Appeal on Friday.

South Bruce Peninsula was convicted on two counts of damaging piping plover habitat in October 2019. A court found the municipality erred when it bulldozed and raked section of Sauble Beach’s north shore in the spring and fall of 2017.

The town appealed their conviction once, but lost, before taking it to the Ontario Court of Appeal in March.

Full Story Here

By Janice MacKay
February 4, 2022 2:37pm
Share via:

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled that Bruce County breached the restricted purpose of the charitable Bruce A. Krug Estate trust.

Justice Lemon has released the decision after a public hearing was held on Friday, November 12, 2021. The court found the County made mistakes in the purchase of 254 High Street.

Bruce County had used trust funds to purchase a property at 254 High Street for the expansion of the Bruce County Museum & Cultural Centre.

On March 21, 2019, Bruce County received an Ontario Superior Court of Justice Application from Blaney McMurtry LLP, the solicitor representing Laura Robinson and The Southampton Cultural Heritage Conservancy. The Application included an injunction restraining Bruce County from continuing any demolition or removal activities at 254 High Street in Southampton, cancelling any demolition permits, and declaring that the County breached the restricted purpose of the charitable trust created by the Estate Gift from Bruce A Krug.

As a response to legal proceedings initiated by Blaney McMurtry LLP, Bruce County issued its own application to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to obtain opinion, advice, and direction to continue to move forward with the Museum expansion.

The last will and testament of Bruce A. Krug bequeathed $500,000 and a portion of the residual of his estate for “the County Archives building for the storage and display of the archives of the County, in memory of Bruce and Howard Krug.

“We (Bruce County Council) accept His Honour’s decision [PDF attached] that We are eager to work towards a resolution with the Public Guardian and Trustee, and Estate Trustee, in this litigation,” said Bruce County Warden Janice Jackson. “The last will and testament of Bruce A. Krug bequeathed $500,000 for the storage and display of archives at the County Archives building. In 2018, we purchased property to expand the Archival Services of the Museum. Our goal has always been to realize the public interest on this property, for the public good. We look forward to engaging with the community to achieve this.”

Full Story Here

South Bruce Peninsula has collected nearly $1 million in revenue this year from parking fees, tickets and bylaw fines at Sauble Beach.

Mayor Janice Jackson said that’s the highest annual amount collected to date and more than covers the roughly $830,000 in gross operating expenses related to Sauble Beach.

“So we were able to recover those costs and have some surplus,” she said Oct. 20.

“I’m relieved. Our costs to operate Sauble Beach increase every year as our contracts increase yearly. So our goal always is to recover enough paid parking revenue so that our taxpayers don’t have to carry that burden at all.”

Jackson said the town is planning to use the estimated $145,000 surplus towards the legal fees the town incurred to both defend itself during a judicial review of a Grey Sauble Conservation Authority permit to cut back a section of dunes along Lakeshore Boulevard to address parking concerns and to appeal its two convictions of damaging endangered piping plover habitat.

South Bruce Peninsula council voted in the spring to increase parking fees at Sauble Beach. The hourly rate was hiked from $3 to $7, while the daily fee went from $15 to $30 and seasonal passes for non-residents went from $50 to $200.

Residents and qualifying Sauble Beach employees could still receive a season pass for $50.

Jackson said, at the time, the increases were approved for several reasons, including to put the parking fees in line with those charged in other Ontario beach towns and to help the municipality recoup legal fees for actions related to Sauble Beach.

Director of legislative services/clerk Angie Cathrae said in a report to council that the town had anticipated $887,410 in paid parking/bylaw enforcement revenue for Sauble Beach in the 2021 budget. That was to include $637,670 from parking fees and passes, $238,000 from tickets and bylaw offences and $11,740 from a provincial grant for implementing cannabis regulations.

The town ended up generating $991,596 in revenue – $819,727 from parking fees and passes, $160,128 from fines and bylaw offences, plus the provincial grant.

Town staff expect another $75,000 will be received in January from fine and offence revenue paid through the courts.

Just over 5,500 parking tickets were issued in 2021, almost all in Sauble Beach. The town says 227 Provincial Offences notices were also issued at the beach.

Sixty-seven of those notices related to dogs, while 65 were issued for cooking devices on the beach, 38 were for having alcohol on the beach, 31 were for tents on the beach and 25 were for smoking in a public place.

The number of POA tickets issued in 2021 was down from 316 in 2020.

Full Story Here

South Bruce Peninsula estimates its legal fees for 2021 will exceed the quarter-million-dollar budget set for those expenses by about $1.76 million due to an earlier-than-anticipated start for the Sauble Beach land dispute trial and unexpected costs to defend itself during a judicial review.

Mayor Janice Jackson said a schedule for the Sauble Beach trial was not known when council set the 2021 budget in December, but officials anticipated it would begin in 2022.

It’s now scheduled to start the week of Nov. 22, she said.

“We’re looking at just over $1 million in legal costs, but it’s a big case. It’s a very big case. It’s the biggest that the town has faced to date,” she said in an interview.

But she said the beach case is critical to the future of South Bruce Peninsula and Sauble Beach.

“It is certainly the focal point of Sauble Beach, which is the major tourism driver for the town. The trickle-down effect to losing the beach I think is far beyond what anybody realizes. It’s the centre of our tourism industry in South Bruce Peninsula and to lose it would be a big blow to the economy in South Bruce Peninsula,” she said.

Saugeen Ojibway Nation is claiming ownership of about 2.25 kilometres of beach from the landmark Sauble Beach sign to about 6th Street North. Jackson has said the town firmly believes that stretch of beach belongs to the people of South Bruce Peninsula.

Town officials say 83 per cent of the projected legal fees budget overage for 2021 is directly related to the beach claim costs, which were to be included in the 2022 budget.

South Bruce Peninsula council had set its legal budget for 2021 at $249,500. About $412,000 has been spent so far.

About $200,000 of that was used to defend the town during a judicial review of a Grey Sauble Conservation Authority permit to cut back a section of dunes along Lakeshore Boulevard and install a retaining wall to address parking safety concerns.

Lawyers on behalf of Sauble Beach resident Tom LaForme asked the Superior Court of Justice to quash and declare null and void the permit for the work.

Jackson said the town is planning to reapply for the permit once the review court releases its reasons for quashing the previous permit. That is expected to happen by the end of this month, she said.

“We are going to try to complete that work this fall,” she said.

Jackson has said the town’s plan to cut back the eastern side of the encroaching dunes and install an 89-centimetre-high retaining wall from the Crowd Inn to Kinloss Lane – about 469 metres away – will address public safety concerns related to angled parking, help stabilize the dunes and eliminate the many “goat paths” over the sandy mounds.

LaForme’s application said the town’s plans would “destroy portions of the sand dunes,” which “help protect many homes and other lakefront properties against floods, storms and extreme weather.” It also said the dunes provide habitat for the endangered piping plover, host rare dune vegetation, bolster biodiversity and provide other ecological benefits.

The review court has said any new permit will require the panel’s reasons before deciding on the town’s application.

Jackson said council approved this week a plan to cover the legal fees budget shortfall.

The town will be using any year-end surpluses to offset the cost and will also draw from a legal reserve fund, which has about $500,000 in it. Any excess funds from paid parking revenue will also help with the shortfall, she said.

“If we still don’t make up for it, we do have a tax stabilization reserve and there’s about $400,000 in that. But it would be preferable not to draw from that, but it is there if we need it,” she said.

“We do anticipate that those costs will be covered.”

Full Story here

Angie Cathrae, states the legal budget for this year is just under $250,000.

Spending to date is just over $412,000 and the town’s legal counsel anticipates costs for the remainder of the year to be over $1.76-million-dollars, limited to existing known cases only.

83% of the variance is directly related to land claim costs that were to be budgeted in 2022.

Mayor Janice Jackson says the legal fees that were approved for this year, “did not include the First Nation’s land claim. It was not scheduled to go to trial until next year but it’s going to trial this November.”

Jackson says the second item that hit the town was the judicial review over the safety work on parking along Lakeshore Boulevard.

She says that was almost $200,000 in legal fees to defend the town against that charge.

However, Mayor Jackson says staff and council will figure out a way to make sure the overage doesn’t “harm taxpayers.”

She says “We’re not interested in having a big tax increase next year.”

Full Story Here

SAUBLE BEACH, ONT. — A local business owner has filed a request for a judicial review to halt plans to alter Sauble Beach’s sand dunes.

Tom Laforme filed the paperwork this week to start court proceedings to try and get the project stopped permanently.

“I am very disappointed in the Mayor and council decision of moving forward now in the spring,” he says.

SAUBLE BEACH, ONT. — A local business owner has filed a request for a judicial review to halt plans to alter Sauble Beach’s sand dunes.

Tom Laforme filed the paperwork this week to start court proceedings to try and get the project stopped permanently.

“I am very disappointed in the Mayor and council decision of moving forward now in the spring,” he says.

Full Story Here